$14.56
(0.95x)
Stock data: Financial Modeling Prep·Updated ·Not investment advice·How we calculate this
Ecopetrol S.A. vs PJSC Gazprom Neft: key figures
 Ecopetrol S.A. EC |
 PJSC Gazprom Neft SIBN |
|
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #773 | #811 |
| Price | $15.32 | $6.34 |
| Market cap | $31.49B | $29.93B |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.06B | 4.72B |
| Change (1 day) | +0.13% | -1.09% |
| Change (1 year) | +53.05% | +9.46% |
The other way round: SIBN with the market cap of EC
$6.68 (1.05x)
If PJSC Gazprom Neft (SIBN) had the market cap of Ecopetrol S.A. (EC), one SIBN would cost $6.68, 1.05 times today's price of $6.34.
Price of SIBN with the Market Cap of ECPrice of EC with the Market Cap of SIBN: the last 12 months
The price of one EC if Ecopetrol S.A. had the market cap of PJSC Gazprom Neft, at the end of each month. Highest: $16.46 (Sep 2026). Lowest: $13.22 (Jul 2026).
- $14.11 Dec 2025
- $15.15 Jan 2026
- $15.26 Feb 2026
- $15.87 Mar 2026
- $15.44 Apr 2026
- $14.95 May 2026
- $13.70 Jun 2026
- $13.22 Jul 2026
- $15.48 Aug 2026
- $16.46 Sep 2026
- $16.08 Oct 2026
- $14.56 Nov 2026
Questions about Ecopetrol S.A. and PJSC Gazprom Neft
What would the price of Ecopetrol S.A. be with the market cap of PJSC Gazprom Neft?
If Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) had the market cap of PJSC Gazprom Neft (SIBN), one EC would cost $14.56, 4.98% less than today's price of $15.32.
How much bigger is Ecopetrol S.A. than PJSC Gazprom Neft?
The market cap of Ecopetrol S.A. ($31.49B) is 1.05 times that of PJSC Gazprom Neft ($29.93B). In Dec 2025 it was the other way round: PJSC Gazprom Neft was 1.43 times bigger than Ecopetrol S.A..
What would the price of PJSC Gazprom Neft be with the market cap of Ecopetrol S.A.?
If PJSC Gazprom Neft (SIBN) had the market cap of Ecopetrol S.A. (EC), one SIBN would cost $6.68, 1.05 times today's price of $6.34.
How is this price calculated?
The market cap of PJSC Gazprom Neft ($29.93B) is divided by the number of EC in circulation (2.06B). Market cap is the price multiplied by the number of coins or shares in circulation.
